Board of Directors Statement on Eviction Moratorium, Rent Cancellation

The MassLandlords Board of Directors met over zoom on July 9, 2020 to evaluate the eviction moratorium, the rent cancellation proposed in HD.5166 An Act to guarantee housing stability during the COVID-19 emergency and recovery, and recent public relations efforts by a corporate landlord to support extension of the moratorium.

“One size does not fit all,” is what we should remember. While a landlord with a greater number of tenants may be able to manage the COVID-19 pandemic with an extended moratorium, the situation of mom and pop landlords and our renters is not reflected in the blanket rent cancellation proposed in HD.5166.

“I have three apartments for rent. If this bill passes, I’m taking them off the market and leaving them empty. I can’t afford to provide free housing while still meeting my obligations as a landlord,” said Director Rich Merlino.

The MassLandlords Board of Directors strongly oppose HD.5166, consistent with near unanimous member sentiment expressed in related policy priorities surveys. This bill is exactly the wrong direction we should go.

We note that we have provided a Fair and Equal Housing Guarantee via Surety Bonds as a fully funded alternative to HD.5166.

We further note that the sweeping and race-neutral character of the language in HD.5166 will have a racist disparate impact on people of color. The reason is plainly given by Massachusetts’ own history:

During rent control in the 70’s, 80’s, and early 90’s, people of color occupied only 12% of rent controlled units, despite representing 24% of the populations of Boston, Cambridge, and Brookline (Sims 2007). When rent control was repealed, the number of people of color living in formerly controlled housing doubled (The Economist, 1998).

The reason for this is systemic racism present in America and the Commonwealth. Regulatory frameworks that drive landlords to screen tougher on econometric data, or hold units vacant, will invariably exclude those of us with unfairly, disproportionately weaker rental applications. Nothing proposed or imagined can force individuals to choose to be housing providers. Nor is the State or its network of nonprofits in any way capable of replacing the affordable, unsubsidized rental housing, most of which is provided by mom and pop landlords, that will disappear unfairly and disastrously for many.

We will continue to collect data to show the true impact of the Commonwealth’s policy decisions on renters, lenders, and municipal budgets. HD.5166 can be expected to lower an already low number of rental units available for tenants, and increase the number of Massachusetts residents experiencing homelessness, with racist disparate impact.

We are evaluating all options to ensure that every Commonwealth resident has access to safe, affordable housing, including possible litigation if this bill is passed.

2 Responses to Board of Directors Statement on Eviction Moratorium, Rent Cancellation

  1. Eugene M says:

    Somebody tell me, what’s wrong with this solution:
    My proposal:

    When people apply for a mortgage, banks use the formula that 28% must go for housing.

    What’s wrong to use the same formula for rent?

    From Taxpayers money State create fund “Help Rent”

    Example: Rent $800

    Tenant lost the job and stopped paying rent. Tenant brings documents to Judge “Layoff letter”, “Unemployment stab $2400per month”.

    Judge decided that tenants can spend only 28% of income on rent. Or $2400 x 28%=$672. But rent $800. Judge gives the landlord difference

    $800-$672=128 from “Help fund”.

    What do you think about my proposal? Its fare?

  2. Yokasta says:

    That will be the right way to handle this but guess they don’t care as this is not affecting them directly, all the weight is on small landlords!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement

Advertisement

Witman Properties Ad

Advertisement

Advertisement