Bills We Filed for the 193rd Session
The two-year legislative session results in all bills filed that session being discarded.
2023-02-09 Business Update - Bills we filed for the 193rd session
Resource Person:
Douglas Quattrochi - Doug
[Start 0:00:00]
Hi! My name is Doug Quattrochi. Iâm the executive director of MassLandlords. Todayâs business update is about bills we filed for this legislative session. Massachusetts operates on a two-year legislative session. Every bill that could possibly pass into law has to have been filed in January unless itâs an emergency bill, and weâre very pleased to report weâve actually got five bills filed, all of interest, this session. The first, lead, weâll talk about that. Second, LLCs, not needing an attorney in court. Third, forfeiture reform. Fourth, climate resilient capital task force. Then, residential assistance for families in transition. Thatâs the order at least on our website.
Actually, first, weâll start with lead. We have actually managed to file our lead bill in the House and the Senate. This would increase the Schedule LP Deleading Credit from $1,500 per unit to $15,000 per unit. Weâve done a previous business update on this. Itâs a really impactful bill, and weâve got a lot of cosponsors in the House and Senate already. If youâre interested in helping us to increase the deleading credit, particularly if youâve already de-leaded your units to help others get this done, ask your senator to cosponsor Senate Docket 862, or ask your representative to cosponsor House Docket 2630. This bill has a real shot at passing into law this session, and itâs going to be our main focus this session because of the early and successful start that itâs got.
Now another bill weâve managed to file in the House is House Docket 2689. This would establish the Climate Resilient Capital Task Force. The picture shown here is the worst-case scenario if all the ice melts all over the globe. This is obviously not going to happen anytime soon, but weâre already seeing rain flood risk and river flood risk in places like Back Bay, Boston, and Pioneer Valley. Weâre seeing these predicted by First Street Foundation to be very urgent. So for instance, there are Back Bay properties that have 99 percent chance of 12 inches of water in them in the next five years. This is something that a lot of people are not aware of, and if youâre concerned about climate like me, please talk to your representative and ask them to sponsor House Docket 2689, an Act to Establish a Climate Resilient Capital Task Force, and potentially start a discussion about managed retreat from certain lots in Massachusetts.
Another bill we filed in the House is House Docket 3676. This would make RAFT permanent and offer a few landlord-focused reforms to boot. This is likely to pass because itâs also being worked on by renter advocates, but they filed a different bill. The main differences between our bill and their bill are about whether RAFT can be paid in arrears or going forward, which is helpful have it going forward, and whether rental assistance becomes a matter of public record at least from the point of view of where itâs distributed. Our bill would keep the names and identities of recipients of rental assistance private, but it would allow us to see the addresses. If youâd like to help us with our litigation against the Department of Housing and Community Development and pass a law that will clarify that mess, please ask your representative to cosponsor House Docket 3676 to let us supervise where rental assistance is distributed.
Another bill that we filed, this one by request, by House Docket 2951, which would not require attorneys to be present when an LLC is in Housing Court. Said another way, in Housing Court today, if youâre an LLC, an Inc, trust, or partnership, or any type of legal entity, youâre required to have an attorney, and as a matter of fact fewer than a third of plaintiffs in Housing Court summary process cases have the choice as to whether to hire an attorney.
When given the choice, however, our data clearly show more than half of landlords would rather go without, and why is this? Itâs because so many Housing Court cases end with mediation. An attorney can be helpful, but if you donât need one if youâre just trying to get the renter to respond and get rental assistance. Because itâs filed by request, this bill isnât terribly likely to have a lot of traction early on, but if youâre interested in talking to your representative about it, ask them to cosponsor House Docket 2951.
The last bill we had a hand in getting filed this session is about civil asset forfeiture reform. I havenât put docket numbers in the slide here because we still have to evaluate the text. Itâs not actually what was passed by the Senate last session. For reasons unbeknownst to us, the Senate refile of civil asset forfeiture and the House refile are different from one another and different from what actually passed the Senate last session. This is something that we have indicated is important to the legislature, but weâll back to you on the exact text and whether we support the particular bills that are out there.
Of course, if youâve been following us, you know that weâve drafted 11 bills that we hope to file over the coming years, and you can see several of these weâre holding onto for future. They were not filed this session, and some of these are really impactful. For instance, we have an alternative to eviction sealing. We have DIY Like-for-Like Repairs Bill. We have a lot more. Itâs really important.
And so we want to thank you if youâre a property rights supporter for helping us get this far especially that Lead Bill. Itâs a huge success to be dual-filed with so many cosponsors. If youâre a member and not a property rights supporter, we encourage you to become one. Thatâs how we do this policy work, and if youâre watching this and not a member, please join us.
If youâre watching this before February 21, 2023, please join me and our legislative affairs counsel, Atty. Peter Vickery, for discussion of this legislation that weâve drafted, as well as all of our policy advocacy, which is more than just what happens at the legislature. Weâll be talking about our litigation against the Department of Housing and Community Development, and the City of Boston to advance our goal of creating better rental housing in Massachusetts.
Thanks very much for your interest and youâre support. Thatâs our business update on policy for today.
[End 0:06:02]

