Filings Week Ending 2021 April 17

Residential summary process: Filings Report This report examines cases filed recently before reading, for which outcomes were largely unknown. Search Period Start: 2021-04-11 Search Period End: 2021-04-17 Earliest Case: 2021-04-12 Latest Case: 2021-04-16 Total Cases: 415 Total Transfers: 15 -- High-level take-aways: Percentage of landlords for whom attorney is optional: 37.1% Of those, percentage pro se: 44.8% Most common cause: Non-payment Least stable municipality/neighborhood: West Yarmouth Least stable with 10+ filings: Worcester Least stable with 100+ filings: (not given) Least stable county: Barnstable Cases per day: 69 Housing crisis baseline max cases per day (UCL): 130 Housing crisis baseline min cases per day (LCL): 44 The number of filings this period is not statistically different from the pre-pandemic housing crisis baseline. -- Courts (n) Count Percent central 91 21.9% eastern 66 15.9% northeast 60 14.5% western 59 14.2% southeast 52 12.5% metro_south 21 5.1% framingham district 11 2.7% quincy district 11 2.7% brockton district 5 1.2% fall river district 5 1.2% lynn district 5 1.2% cambridge district 4 1.0% fallmouth district 4 1.0% orleans district 3 0.7% barnstable district 2 0.5% chelsea district 2 0.5% newburyport district 2 0.5% pittsfield district 2 0.5% somerville district 2 0.5% ayer district 1 0.2% bmc brighton 1 0.2% lawrence district 1 0.2% malden district 1 0.2% northampton district 1 0.2% northern berkshire district 1 0.2% stoughton district 1 0.2% woburn district 1 0.2% Party Type (n) Plaintiffs Defendants Corporate Entity 261 1 Natural Person 154 414 Total 415 415 (%) Plaintiffs Defendants Corporate Entity 62.9% 0.2% Natural Person 37.1% 99.8% Total 100.0% 100.0% Plaintiff Representation (n) Has Attorney Pro Se Total Required 251 10 261 Optional 85 69 154 Total 336 79 415 (%) Has Attorney Pro Se Total Required 60.5% 2.4% 62.9% Optional 20.5% 16.6% 37.1% Total 81.0% 19.0% 100.0% Defendant Representation Important: Defendants will not have an attorney known to the plaintiff at time of filing unless this is an ongoing matter. 100% pro se is to be expected in all filing reports except to the extent time passes between filing and staff review. See outcomes report for final assessment. (n) Has Attorney Pro Se Total Required 0 1 1 Optional 10 404 414 Total 10 405 415 (%) Has Attorney Pro Se Total Required 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% Optional 2.4% 97.3% 99.8% Total 2.4% 97.6% 100.0% Number of Adults in Households Count Percent 0 29 7.0% 1 316 76.1% 2 50 12.0% 3 12 2.9% 4 6 1.4% 5 1 0.2% 6 1 0.2% Total 415 100.0% Note: Households may appear with zero adults due to clerical delay entering known defendants, identity protection obscuring known defendants (e.g., 42 USC Sections 13701 through 1404 Violence Against Women Act), or no adult defendants (e.g., abandonment of minors). Initiating Action Count Percent Non-payment 249 60.0% No Fault 75 18.1% Cause 66 15.9% Unknown/Other 24 5.8% Foreclosure 1 0.2% Rate per 100,000 Municipality Residents Count West Yarmouth 56 3 Baldwinville 52 1 East Falmouth 51 3 Gardner 34 7 Ashby 32 1 Fiskdale 32 1 Worcester 27 49 Newton Center 25 1 Roslindale 24 7 Forestdale 22 1 South Grafton 22 1 New Bedford 21 20 North Brookfield 21 1 Eastham 20 1 Framingham 20 14 Marstons Mills 20 1 Hull 19 2 Yarmouth Port 19 1 Athol 17 2 Fitchburg 17 7 Norwood 17 5 Hudson 15 3 West Bridgewater 14 1 Braintree 13 5 Fall River 13 12 Plainville 12 1 Salisbury 12 1 Swansea 12 2 Webster 11 2 Allston 10 3 East Weymouth 9 5 Leicester 9 1 Leominster 9 4 Lunenburg 9 1 Harwich 8 1 Middleborough 8 2 Brockton 7 7 Clinton 7 1 Hyannis 7 1 North Adams 7 1 Northborough 7 1 Revere 7 4 Easthampton 6 1 Fairhaven 6 1 Falmouth 6 2 Lynn 6 6 North Attleborough 6 2 Northbridge 6 1 Westport 6 1 Whitman 6 1 Cambridge 5 6 Marlborough 5 2 Newburyport 5 1 Plymouth 5 3 Quincy 5 5 Roxbury 5 3 Somerset 5 1 Sudbury 5 1 Taunton 5 3 Westborough 5 1 Canton 4 1 Dedham 4 1 North Dartmouth 4 1 Pittsfield 4 2 Westfield 4 2 Dorchester 3 3 Randolph 3 1 West Roxbury 3 1 Attleborough 2 1 Brighton 2 1 Chelsea 2 1 East Boston 2 1 Hyde Park 2 1 Mattapan 2 1 Somerville 2 2 Woburn 2 1 Dorchester Center 1 1 Lawrence 1 1 Malden 1 1 Medford 1 1 South Weymouth 1 1 Weymouth 1 1 (not given) 0 150 Boston 0 6 span 0 3 Rate per 100,000 residents based on 2010 census. Municipalities do not appear if no evictions filed. Where neighborhoods are commonly recognized as municipalities, data appears under the neighborhood rather than the legal entity (e.g., "Roxbury" is separate from "Boston".) Where municipalities have alternate spellings (e.g., Marlboro for Marlborough), totals appear under the long form. Efforts are made to correct clerical errors in the court database, but clerical errors may appear. Rate per 100,000 County Renter Households Count Barnstable 72 14 Worcester 72 81 Bristol 53 44 Plymouth 37 16 Norfolk 30 26 Berkshire 18 3 Suffolk 16 33 Middlesex 14 33 Essex 8 9 Hampshire 5 1 Hampden 2 2 Dukes 0 0 Franklin 0 0 Nantucket 0 0 Rate per 100,000 renter households based on 2019 ACS. Counties appear even if no evictions filed. -- Data Sources (report errors to hello@masslandlords.net): County Data Households Percent Renters Barnstable 96,509 20.0% Berkshire 53,792 30.0% Bristol 220,528 37.3% Dukes 18,146 22.6% Essex 297,898 36.9% Franklin 30,927 34.1% Hampden 179,970 39.5% Hampshire 60,002 30.7% Middlesex 612,366 38.1% Nantucket 11,399 30.8% Norfolk 269,717 31.6% Plymouth 191,041 22.6% Suffolk 309,945 63.7% Worcester 316,162 35.2% County Households: 2019 ACS TableID S1101 County Households and Renters, Dukes and Nantucket: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/dukescountymassachusetts County Households and Renters, Large Counties: https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=S11&g=0400000US25.050000&d=ACS%201-Year%20Estimates%20Subject%20Tables&tid=ACSST1Y2019.S1101&hidePreview=true Dukes County Renters: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/dukescountymassachusetts Nantucket County Renters: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/nantucketcountymassachusetts -- Methodology Publicly available records at MassCourts.org are read fully manually at two intervals: 1.) For a filings report, once within approximately one week of filing; 2.) For an outcomes report, once again approximately 12 to 18 months after filing. Cases are searched by 'case type' = 'summary process', party type = 'plaintiff' within date ranges, typically weekly. MassCourts.org displays matches, not cases. X plaintiffs on a single case result in X separate matches. Cases are manually de-duplicated. Where the number of matches exceeds the number displayed (e.g., 'Displaying 100 of 257 total matches.'), date ranges are reduced until all cases may be viewed. If the date range cannot be reduced (i.e., is one day) but matches still exceed the display limit of 100, then two additional passes are taken. First, municipalities are filtered in stages. Second, to capture cases with no municipality entered, the search switches from 'case type' to 'case number', guessing the missing numbers assuming serialized entry. This method results in 'matches' reconciled to case counts. This effort costs more than 1 FTE. Summary spreadsheets are produced by copying exactly what is read. The spreadsheets are processed using proprietary software. Repeated analyses of local spreadsheets does not burden the MassCourts servers. The software is developed using best practices for revision control and regression testing. Limitations: Data are snapshots. As such, we cannot track individual cases over time or produce real-time reports. MassLandlords does not have access to court databases beyond what is published in human readable form at MassCourts.org. As of this report, MassLandlords staff were not considering information available to attorneys (e.g., the contents of notices, discovery, evidence, etc.) but not available to the general public. All data presented here are readily verifiable at MassCourts.org without special permission. Information is not independently verified outside of the court record. For instance, clerical errors in address, omissions of a defendant, etc. are not readily verifiable. As this process matures, reporting algorithms may change. Transfers are counted as new cases. Clerical differences between original case and transfer (e.g., middle initial included then dropped; defendant dropped on transfer; street address spelling changed) as well as the potential for indefinite circular transferring (e.g., foreclosure cases moving between housing, land, and/or superior courts) make it very difficult to programmatically identify continuing matters. -- When Citing This Work, Please Credit: MassLandlords, Inc. Available online at https://masslandlords.net/policy/eviction-data/.